Skip to content

feat(comparison): add Custom Blocks as a comparison-page fact#5519

Merged
waleedlatif1 merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
worktree-comparison-custom-blocks
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

feat(comparison): add Custom Blocks as a comparison-page fact#5519
waleedlatif1 merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
worktree-comparison-custom-blocks

Conversation

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Added a new "Custom blocks" row to the platform section of every comparison page, covering whether a platform lets a builder publish a deployed workflow as a reusable, encapsulated block for org-wide reuse
  • Sourced an accurate answer for Sim and all 20 competitors, distinguishing genuine equivalents from look-alike features (sub-workflow composition, custom code nodes, connector wrappers, template galleries)

Type of Change

  • New feature (comparison-page content)

Testing

Tested manually — tsc and biome check pass clean on all touched files; every new claim's citations were fetched and verified live.

Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • Self-reviewed my changes
  • Tests added/updated and passing
  • No new warnings introduced
  • I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms outlined in the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

- New "customBlocks" row in the platform section: whether a platform
  lets a builder publish a deployed workflow as a reusable, encapsulated
  block for org-wide reuse (Sim's new Custom Blocks feature)
- Researched and sourced an accurate answer for all 20 competitors,
  distinguishing real equivalents from look-alikes (sub-workflow
  composition, custom code nodes, connector wrappers, templates)
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs Skipped Skipped Jul 8, 2026 10:35pm

Request Review

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Static comparison content and type/schema updates only; no product runtime or auth/data-path changes.

Overview
Adds a new Platform comparison dimension, Custom blocks (org-wide reuse), so pages can contrast publishing a deployed workflow as an encapsulated, org-wide toolbar block (hidden internals, curated I/O, live sync to latest deploy) versus adjacent features like sub-workflows, skills, and connector wrappers.

The customBlocks fact is typed in ComparisonFacts, registered in comparison-sections.ts, and filled for Sim (yes, Enterprise / self-hosted flag) and 20 competitors with sourced value / detail / shortValue / confidence entries. Most vendors are rated no; Microsoft Copilot Studio and Vellum are partial where tool/deployment reuse exists but not a governed org-wide block palette.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5b721a8. Configure here.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR adds Custom Blocks as a comparison-page fact. The main changes are:

  • A new platform row for Custom blocks.
  • A required customBlocks fact in the comparison data type.
  • Sourced Custom Blocks entries for Sim and each competitor.

Confidence Score: 5/5

This looks safe to merge.

  • No blocking issues found in the changed code.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
apps/sim/app/(landing)/comparison/comparison-sections.ts Adds the Custom blocks row to the platform comparison section.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/types.ts Adds customBlocks as a required platform fact.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/sim.ts Adds Sim's sourced Custom Blocks comparison fact.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/competitors/*.ts Adds sourced Custom Blocks facts for competitor profiles.

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "feat(comparison): add Custom Blocks as a..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@waleedlatif1 waleedlatif1 merged commit 57ff500 into staging Jul 8, 2026
18 checks passed
@waleedlatif1 waleedlatif1 deleted the worktree-comparison-custom-blocks branch July 8, 2026 22:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant